• disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Russia is taking Ukrainian children, placing them in foster care, and putting them up for adoption to be raised as Russians. This is the definition of genocide.

    Genocide is an internationally recognized crime where acts are committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group. These acts fall into five categories:

    1. Killing members of the group
    2. Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group
    3. Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part
    4. Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group
    5. Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group
      • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        You are implying this is some diplomatic decision. They are being abducted. They have no choice. Again, these children are being placed in foster homes and put up for adoption to be raised as if they are Russian. This isn’t a refugee rescue operation. It’s cultural genocide. You’re either wildly obtuse, or in defense of genocide.

        https://www.reuters.com/world/us-aware-credible-reports-russia-is-listing-ukrainian-children-adoption-white-2024-06-12/

        • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          29
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          So you would prefer that they be left where they are, understood.

          Personally I think it’s good that children not be left in dangerous, traumatic situations, but if you want to classify something as “genocide” when it involves saving the lives of the “victims,” then I guess I am defending “genocide.” And if you wanted to call if “murder” when I take a drink of water, I guess that means I’ll defend “murder” too. If you play around with words enough you can make anything look bad.

          I consider people being slaughtered worse than children being raised in a culture different from that of their parents, so sue me.

            • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              20
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              You’re using a false-dilemma argument

              No, I’m using a real-dilemma argument. If you’d care to provide an alternative to taking them out of a war zone or leaving them there, I would love to hear it.

              How many Rubles do you get per comment?

              Of course, the “everyone who disagrees with me is a secret agent” conspiracy theory. I’m not feeling particularly quippy today so I’m not going to bother making fun of it.

                • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  20
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Where they’ll be raised by French or German or English parents, etc. Still doesn’t address your core issue.

                  • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    15
                    arrow-down
                    5
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    No. Refugees are given temporary amnesty until the war is over. Then they will work with the Ukrainian government for reconnection with family or adoption.

                    Russia is placing them in homes that will raise them as Russians, with no intention of returning these children to Ukraine.

          • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            5 months ago

            We would prefer they go with their parents or at least family.

            Which Russia is preventing by kidnapping them.

            • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              17
              ·
              5 months ago

              We’re talking about war orphans. Generally, their family is either dead or can’t be located.

              • tres_cool@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                Most people have extended families, that could be located if someone tried. But I think you knew that.

                • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Yes, and hopefully peace will be achieved as soon as possible so that that process can happen, but it’s a little hard to track people down during the chaos of war. This isn’t a new phenomenon.

      • jumjummy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        5 months ago

        What a moronic take. Those Russian must be saints taking those poor Ukrainian children after, you know, illegally invading their country, killing their parents, and destroying their cities.

        • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          23
          ·
          5 months ago

          I never called them saints, I only said that transporting war orphans into safety is not genocide.

            • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              16
              ·
              5 months ago

              Being a tankie is when you consider children being adopted to parents who raise them in a safe environment “safety,” in comparison to living in a war zone.

      • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I can think of one country first in line to take them: Ukraine, or Ukrainian refugees sheltering in NATO countries. Wtf kind of fascist take are you spewing? 'Someone has to save these kids from the warzone we created; can’t just give them to their extended families, those are the enemy, guess we have no choice but to do genocide '. Get the fuck out of here.

        • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          5 months ago

          We’re talking about war orphans, children whose families cannot be located.

          • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            Did they try locating the extended families, or did they just abduct thousands of children to be raised as Russians? That’s a rhetorical question, they did the latter.

            • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              5 months ago

              War orphans are not a new thing. Every war that’s ever been caught has produced children who’s families cannot be found, because wars are chaotic and also deadly.

              • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                Oh yeah, like how during the Iraq war when the US abducted all those Iraqi children and gave them to American families? Or when France stole all those orphans from central Africa to raise as little French kids? Or when the Canadian adoption system was flush with Afghani children they took away from their families and homeland?

                Pretty sure abducting children after killing their parents has always been wrong.

                • NuclearDolphin@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  This only didnt happen because Americans feel no empathy to help non-white children and families.

                  • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    5 months ago

                    When has it happened in a situation that wasn’t genocide? Did the British adopt thousands of German children in WW2? Were thousands of Italian children adopted away to America?

                    In what conflict has this ever been acceptable?

                • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  If the US ever tried evacuating Iraqi orphans into the US adoption system, the right would start race riots over it. We didn’t even let our collaborators in.

                  No, instead, the children were left in the war zone where countless numbers were killed.

      • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        So if Israel took every Palestinian child they saw, regardless of what family they have, and brought them to Israel for an Israeli family to raise, you’d be fine with that?

        • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          5 months ago

          So if Israel took every Palestinian child they saw, regardless of what family they have

          Russia is not doing this. We’re talking about war orphans.

            • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              13
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              I’d be better than the current situation, yes. It’s by no means ideal, but Palestinian children would be better off being adopted by Israeli families than starving to death or being bombed or shot. My problem is with them putting them in the situation in the first place.

              • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                5 months ago

                I mean, it’s hard to argue with that. It would still be genocide, but at least kids wouldn’t be dying.

                God. It’s fucked up.

                • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  Objection used a false comparison.

                  A more direct analogy would be if they were being put up for adoption by the Israeli government. That’s what makes it genocide. Once adopted, they become property of the Russian family. They’re not being returned to their homes when the war is over like the refugees who have sought amnesty in the EU.

                • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  11
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  What I’m saying is that the problem isn’t moving war orphans out of a conflict zone, the problem is that there’s a conflict zone in the first place.

                  It’s not as if these orphans are some sort of “prize” to be won and brought home as spoils. Caring for them takes resources. Individual Russian families are not out there twirling their moustaches thinking, “How can I help destroy Ukrainian culture… I know! I’ll adopt a child and spend years raising them as my own, that’ll show 'em!”