• warm@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Then it’s a public transport failure, USA has horrible train infrastructure.

    But even suburbs lack paths for pedestrians, even if you wanted to walk into town it’s dangerous from the get go. The whole country is designed for cars and nothing else, there have been projects I have seen though in some cities where they tear down highways and build pedestrian areas instead, so it’s not an unsolvable problem if they can beat the lobbying.

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      for a country that supposedly values freedom its amusing to note how few things are considered freedoms:

      driving = freedom*

      walking = not freedom

      clean air = not freedom

      quality public transit = not freedom

      *with purchase of expensive vehicle

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        5 months ago

        driving = freedom

        *with purchase of expensive vehicle

        And legally-required insurance, and being licensed by the State to operate it…

      • AmidFuror@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s entirely consistent with freedom. Freedom to build with little thought to long term effects. Freedom from paying for infrastructure that benefits everyone.

        To do things correctly you need to restrict and regulate.

    • bluGill@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      Suburbs have great pedestrian paths - if your only goal is to exercise. Those paths don’t go anywhere, but living in the suburbs I many people using them for exercise.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        Even for exercise they tend to be non-existent or suck, which means people end up driving to the few that are good rather than starting their jog from their front door.

        • bluGill@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Not in the suburbs near me - they are all new suburbs build in the last 3-10 years though. (3 years is important as sidewalks are built last so until the houses are all done the sidewalks don’t connect). Older suburbs though, rarely have sidewalks.