In a televised meeting with his Security Council in Moscow on Wednesday, the Russian leader responded to the announcement that the U.S. would "immediately" resume tests.
  • Doomsider@lemmy.worldEnglish
    15·
    12 hours ago

    You mean a dirty nuclear bomb/rocket that can easily swap out a conventional warhead for a nuclear one.

    That is not an important distinction. It was a nuclear test.

    • remon@ani.socialEnglish
      31·
      3 hours ago

      Testing a nuclear reactor (which happens all the time, all over the place) is very different from testing a nuclear bomb.

      The distinction literally couldn’t be fucking more important.

      • Doomsider@lemmy.worldEnglish
        13·
        3 hours ago

        OP said nuclear test, not a nuclear bomb. It was definitely a nuclear test.

        Furthermore, this is why Trump is asking for nuclear testing as a reaction to Russia’s big bad new weapon. Also, the whole spend more money on the military angle that the US is obsessed with.

        So there is no distinction because you are just wrong at this point on multiple levels.

        • remon@ani.socialEnglish
          31·
          3 hours ago

          And the comment after that clarified that this article is about nuclear bomb test, not a nuclear powered vehicle, to which you then replied with the absolutely ludicrous statement that the distinction isn’t important.

          Feel free to keep arguing, but you’re just putting on your clown make up right now.

          • Doomsider@lemmy.worldEnglish
            14·
            3 hours ago

            Apparently, you need to comment on another thread where you are not blatantly wrong.

            Also, you are acting pretty trollish for getting put in your place.