Edan van Haren, a victim of child predator Maurice Van Ryn, says legal loopholes are allowing the confessed paedophile to protect his assets in superannuation to avoid paying compensation.
I know nothing about Australian law, but American bankruptcy allows for claim holders to object to the discharge of a debt, and court judgements for criminal acts are one that’s particularly likely to have that upheld as I recall. Do they not allow for that in Australia?
I know nothing about Australian law, but American bankruptcy allows for claim holders to object to the discharge of a debt, and court judgements for criminal acts are one that’s particularly likely to have that upheld as I recall. Do they not allow for that in Australia?