• OrkneyKomodo@lemmy.sdf.org
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I was considering blocking all posts containing youtube links. No-one wants some opionated arse-monger broadcasting to them in bed.

    • library_napper@monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      There are folks on YouTube that cite their sources. Don’t ban the platform just because many of the uses suck.

  • jeffhykin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Videos can* provide better privacy explanations (ex: animating asymmetric key exchange) The videos that get posted on here, well…

    How about banning video essays?

    • library_napper@monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      This. It depends on the source. Always consider the source.

      Even a video essay can be credible, if they cite their sources

  • Infiltrated_ad8271@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    More than posting their own channels or doing it on an anti-privacy website, I am annoyed by the medium itself. Even if it’s a topic of interest, videos can become really tedious depending on the author with no practical way to get around it, plus very little accessibility; it’s always more convenient in text.

    • library_napper@monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Some would argue it’s more accessible in video format. Personally I think it’s best to write an article and then do a breif video summary that links to the article “for more info”

  • library_napper@monyet.cc
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    The only reason advertising was banned on reddit was so they could monetize. If the content is relevant to the community, I don’t care if the person sharing it created it. I appreciate the submission.

    Let the votes decide the quality of the content.

    • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I don’t really care if someone shares their own content as a participating member of the community, but these people are dwarfed by those who just spam their links to every community on Lemmy that bares even the slightest amount of relevance.

      • library_napper@monyet.cc
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        You dont know that tho. I have multiple lemmmy accounts. Most if them are anonymous, but when I post my own content, I use my real name.

        The only thing I use my “real name” Lemmy account for is self - promotion, but that doesn’t mean I dont participate with other accounts.

        Folks have the right to anonymity.

        • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Why would you run, for example, a programming based YouTube channel, but not want to use that same account when interacting with the community on topics of programming? You have a right to anonymity, but people also have the right to block you if you only use that account to spam links in different communities with no other engagement because there’s nothing to differentiate you from all the bots doing the same thing for different reasons.

          • library_napper@monyet.cc
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            My point is you shouldn’t make assumptions. Just because you can’t track all of my activity doesn’t mean I’m a bot.

      • unexpectedteapot@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        “Let the votes decide the quality of the content” is capitalist rhetoric that was the start of reddit’s end. It is not an argument, it is not a principle to stand behind, and it most definitely is not a better alternative to guidelines the community can vote on.