you say that you can not argue in good faith, i am already convinced that capitalism as i experience it does not work for very long. yet i have concerns that specifically anarchy is not scalable. and so my current belief is that democracy needs to be reset continuously.
i believe that i have been more then fair, this was your explanation to fail. i have many more issues that i have not gone over with anarchy, but i feel that if there are no mechanisms to handle the negatives of human nature, then i realy can’t even start to explore them. so far anarchy seems to be a holding pattern until the next force moves in that solves these deficiencies. And looking across history, again and again, i see this exact senario play out each time.
coordination can be done, but you have no answer to scaleability, discord, and to bad actors, nor to disenfranchisement of the minority.
but i guess your admitting that you are incapable of honestly answering, then i guess we are done! there is no where else to go.
You can’t grasp fundamental ideas. Ive cited sources i think. I’m not going to explain this; you can read a book. A paradise made in hell, the dawn of everything: a new history of humanity, debt: the first 5000 years, and anything on the CNT or zapatistas. Until youve read about all those, im not interested in talking to spevifically you.
Until cleared if your fundamental delusion, i cannot argue with you, and you can only loop on your one thing. That’s not something I’m interested in validating or find it amusing to fuck with. It’s boring and stupid.
Bonus points: prove your coercion actually creates coordination; im convinced extant coordination happens mostly in spite of your coercive violence. I’ve asked this several times but you haven’t even nodded to it. You’re just restatinh your point and not responding yo anything ive said. I’m not even sure you’re really reading this. If you are, you’re reading only with an eye to confirm what you already believe, rather than try to figure out what others are thinking, and talking at that is pointless.
you say that you can not argue in good faith, i am already convinced that capitalism as i experience it does not work for very long. yet i have concerns that specifically anarchy is not scalable. and so my current belief is that democracy needs to be reset continuously.
i believe that i have been more then fair, this was your explanation to fail. i have many more issues that i have not gone over with anarchy, but i feel that if there are no mechanisms to handle the negatives of human nature, then i realy can’t even start to explore them. so far anarchy seems to be a holding pattern until the next force moves in that solves these deficiencies. And looking across history, again and again, i see this exact senario play out each time.
coordination can be done, but you have no answer to scaleability, discord, and to bad actors, nor to disenfranchisement of the minority.
but i guess your admitting that you are incapable of honestly answering, then i guess we are done! there is no where else to go.
You can’t grasp fundamental ideas. Ive cited sources i think. I’m not going to explain this; you can read a book. A paradise made in hell, the dawn of everything: a new history of humanity, debt: the first 5000 years, and anything on the CNT or zapatistas. Until youve read about all those, im not interested in talking to spevifically you.
Until cleared if your fundamental delusion, i cannot argue with you, and you can only loop on your one thing. That’s not something I’m interested in validating or find it amusing to fuck with. It’s boring and stupid.
Bonus points: prove your coercion actually creates coordination; im convinced extant coordination happens mostly in spite of your coercive violence. I’ve asked this several times but you haven’t even nodded to it. You’re just restatinh your point and not responding yo anything ive said. I’m not even sure you’re really reading this. If you are, you’re reading only with an eye to confirm what you already believe, rather than try to figure out what others are thinking, and talking at that is pointless.