Republican congressman Mike Flood has gotten an earful during a Nebraska town hall held to defend his support of President Donald Trump’s tax breaks and spending cuts law.

  • Stovetop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    That might have been an argument in 2016, but Trump won the popular vote in 2024. Both across the US, and specifically in Nebraska.

    Nebraska is also one of only two states in the US (the other being Maine) where they don’t use a winner-take-all system. They divide votes by district, which saw 4 EC votes for Trump and 1 EC vote for Harris. Albeit, if the districts were stacked closer to proportional representation, it should have only been 3 votes for Trump and 2 for Harris.

    I’ve got some extra blame to throw around, at any rate. I’m sympathetic to the people in this audience who want their voice to be heard, but the fact remains that there are still more Trump supporters in Nebraska than supporters of Harris or any other candidate. The majority got their way.

    • Feyd@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Can you explain to me how responding that they deserved it to these people (that probably largely didn’t vote for trump) in the context that they are going to their rep’s town Hall and raising these issues directly is useful? Seriously fuck this attitude.

      • Stovetop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        I don’t believe these people deserved it. But these people aren’t “Nebraska”, or at least not the majority of it.

        • Chulk@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Okay, but we’re talking about “these people,” not “Nebraska”

            • Chulk@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              You’re right. That is what they said. Now go up another level. What was that person commenting on? In other words, what was the context for their comment?