Curious from people who follow its development closely.

  • What protocol are about to be finally implemented?
  • Which ones are still a struggle?
  • How many serious protocols are there missing?

https://arewewaylandyet.com/

    • bastonia@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      while Debian is still deciding if they ship with Wayland by default or not, Fedora and KDE are planning to already completely drop x11 for their next release (they ship Wayland by default)

      • shaytan@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 months ago

        Fedora 40 with kde plasma 6 dropped a day or two ago, and they did remove x11, you have to get it from the repo in case you want it, otherwise, it only comes and is planned for wayland, which I believe is great, for once it does seem like the year of wayland

      • bamboo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        For Fedora I’m not surprised, but KDE is considering dropping X11 support already?

      • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Fedora should drop every other DE except KDE. That would really free up some resources.

        • bamboo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          It would also uncheck a lot of accessibility requirements that RHEL in particular needs.

          • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            I was kidding about Fedora but Red Hat can actually afford to do that. They’re not a generalist distro, they can and should offer their customers a very specific desktop stack.

            • bamboo@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Part of the reason red hat uses gnome is because it is the only desktop that meets many accessibility requirements. It would be a huge engineering effort to bring any other desktop up to par in that regard. Most graphical Linux software is really far behind in accessibility.

              • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                It doesn’t have to be KDE. That was just the joke for Fedora.

                Unlike Fedora, Red Hat can actually afford to use a single DE and a very specific graphics stack and to get rid of X completely. They don’t have to support the full breadth and legacy of Linux desktop apps. For Red Hat machines the desktop is just a means to an end – it facilitates access to certain GUI tools.