• Display name@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        25
        ·
        3 months ago

        Meh, can you really say that it’s the proletarian dictatorship anymore when Cuba now has a privileged elite defending it’s grip on power against the poor majority? It’s more like they have become the bourgeoisie.

              • Display name@feddit.nu
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                18
                ·
                3 months ago

                Ah okey ^^ but that’s my point. The revolution abolished the then existing classes but now the party has cemented into the now ruling class. They enjoy the privileges and aggregate all the power to themselves where the now again born under class can’t do anything. I understand what you mean but I think we have to see Cuba for the state its in, not the promise of what it would become.

                • im sorry, but you have been propagandized. the things you said are nothing but mere repetitions of cia lies about cuba, parroted since the 60s. please try learning about the actual conditions in cuba before and after the revolution before giving any statements.

                  no investigation no right to speak

                  • Display name@feddit.nu
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    13
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    Well I’m not going to travel to Cuba for the sake of an internet discussion xD But it is true that political opposition is forbidden and the only allowed party is the communist, right?

        • 420blazeit69 [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          35
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I’m sure you have some kind of a source for such an outlandish claim. How much time do you spend looking at the compensation of Cuban politicians?

          • Display name@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            3 months ago

            You could probably understand the reasoning if you read the rest of the thread. What kind of compensation do you have in mind?

            • 420blazeit69 [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              32
              ·
              3 months ago

              I’ve read the thread. You have no source and you have not even tried to educate yourself on the basics of the Cuban government. You invented an accusation out of thin air and are somehow surprised people don’t uncritically believe it.

              • Display name@feddit.nu
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                3 months ago

                Alright, what do you request a source for? Can’t say I’m surprised at others not agreeing in a discussion. Do you usually get surprised by that?

                • 420blazeit69 [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  28
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Cuba now has a privileged elite defending it’s grip on power against the poor majority

                  Source this.

                  You have done zero investigation into how well off Cuban leaders are compared to the average Cuban. You have done zero investigation into how this compares to peer countries.

                  You just made it up because it sounds like a Bad Country thing, someone told you once that Cuba is a Bad Country, and you never bothered to learn about the place yourself.

                  • Display name@feddit.nu
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    8
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    Ok, so the communist party says who can be in the Nation Assembly. The communist party sits on all the political power just by having the power over appointment. There are no free candidacy for the national assembly, effectively aggregating all power to themselves making them the de facto ruling class. See the issue?

        • Display name@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          3 months ago

          Ah thanks. Maybe should have used the proper authoritarian. Dictatorship is just a much easier and more widely recognized term no?

          • well, every state is authoritarian. thats part of the self preservation of any governance, be it progressive or reactionary. if you wanna abolish states alltogether ask the anarchists, since i am an ml and think that authoritarian measures are good for the liberation of mankind.

            • Display name@feddit.nu
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              15
              ·
              3 months ago

              Haha yeah in a sense maybe. But the authoritarian meaning is that there’s no free or equal competition for the power so I mean there’s quite a difference between states where there are authoritan and democratic countries.

              • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                26
                ·
                3 months ago

                equal competition for the power

                Show me any state where there is an “equal competition for power” in any general sense. The Democrats and Republicans having similar degrees of power means nothing but a duopoly if they each exist above democracy as private entities (and they do) and there is no “equal” competition with more progressive groups.