This person has not read the Mueller report, which basically says “If we had the power to charge the president with a crime, we would, but we don’t, so we’re referring this to the attorney general since that is his job”
And then Bill Barr farted on it and trump bragged about being exonerated.
I read the comments. Very aware, but thanks for adding it here.
BIAB isn’t my target audience. It takes a lot of rubles to buy that kind of stupidity, and I just don’t have a piggy bank that can compete with Uncle Vlad’s. My targets are the people who might read that slop and go “maybe this guy is right”.
Can you provide evidence of me being intolerant of evidence so I can see if I’m actually intolerant of evidence? Or are you just making shit up and hoping that no one actually checks?
I have, it didn’t provide any of the evidence you claim, hence why you can’t actually point to any.
When you obviously haven’t, and then when I pointed out what the Mueller report actually said about the president’s criminal behavior, your response was…
Please cite the part of the Mueller report that backs up the claim of a “Russian Intelligence Operation That Hooked Musk And Thiel”
I pointed out that what you wanted evidence for was not something that was specifically asserted in the thread, so you then linked a comment from a different thread, which didn’t even back up your point to begin with, it was just another comment saying that you should read the Mueller report.
And you think I’m the one that is intolerant to evidence?
When you obviously haven’t, and then when I pointed out what the Mueller report actually said about the president’s criminal behavior, your reaponse was…
This was not about the president. This was about the actual topic of the post.
I pointed out that what you wanted evidence for was not something that was specifically asserted in the thread
Actually it was.
And you think I’m the one that is intolerant to evidence?
Yes, given that you are deliberately straw-manning me to attack me asking for evidence.
Do you have any evidence of me building a strawman to attack you?
PS. You built a strawman when you complained about Thiel and Musk not being in the Mueller report, something that was not asserted in the thread, nor was it a defined scope or goal of the Mueller report, which was the conclusion of investigations into Russian interference in the 2016 General Election.
PSA, @InternetCitizen2 is a self admitted troll who has been stalking me accross the fediverse making accusations he can’t back up because he’s angry I said genocide denial is bad.
Nope. It’s not there. If you’re going to deliberately play dumb because you can’t handle people asking for evidence, there’s nothing I can do about it.
This person has not read the Mueller report, which basically says “If we had the power to charge the president with a crime, we would, but we don’t, so we’re referring this to the attorney general since that is his job”
And then Bill Barr farted on it and trump bragged about being exonerated.
PSA @BrainInABox@lemmy.ml is a troll.
I read the comments. Very aware, but thanks for adding it here.
BIAB isn’t my target audience. It takes a lot of rubles to buy that kind of stupidity, and I just don’t have a piggy bank that can compete with Uncle Vlad’s. My targets are the people who might read that slop and go “maybe this guy is right”.
Doing the Lords work.
Damn, you really can’t tolerate someone asking for evidence can you?
Can you provide evidence of me being intolerant of evidence so I can see if I’m actually intolerant of evidence? Or are you just making shit up and hoping that no one actually checks?
Sure. This comment where you called me a troll, stupid, a Russian shill, and my comments slop, all for the crime of asking for evidence
So let me get this straight.
You claimed you read the Mueller report.
When you obviously haven’t, and then when I pointed out what the Mueller report actually said about the president’s criminal behavior, your response was…
I pointed out that what you wanted evidence for was not something that was specifically asserted in the thread, so you then linked a comment from a different thread, which didn’t even back up your point to begin with, it was just another comment saying that you should read the Mueller report.
And you think I’m the one that is intolerant to evidence?
This was not about the president. This was about the actual topic of the post.
Actually it was.
Yes, given that you are deliberately straw-manning me to attack me asking for evidence.
Do you have any evidence of me building a strawman to attack you?
PS. You built a strawman when you complained about Thiel and Musk not being in the Mueller report, something that was not asserted in the thread, nor was it a defined scope or goal of the Mueller report, which was the conclusion of investigations into Russian interference in the 2016 General Election.
PSA, @InternetCitizen2 is a self admitted troll who has been stalking me accross the fediverse making accusations he can’t back up because he’s angry I said genocide denial is bad.
Who?
The person you just replied to?
Where?
https://lemmy.ml/post/30295673/18706282
Oh, you stilly goose, that was minutes ago. I just replied to you actually.
Please cite the part of the Mueller report that backs up the claim of a “Russian Intelligence Operation That Hooked Musk And Thiel”
Feel free to quote where that was an assertion that was made in this thread.
OK
That’s not part of this thread. Feel free to try again.
https://lemmy.ml/post/30295673/18697852
That’s a nice link. Still missing the assertion that the Mueller report had anything to say about Musk or Thiel.
Woudl you like to try again, or just fade away and save a little face?
Nope. It’s there. If you’re going to deliberately play dumb because you can’t handle people asking for evidence, there’s nothing I can do about it.
Nope. It’s not there. If you’re going to deliberately play dumb because you can’t handle people asking for evidence, there’s nothing I can do about it.