• yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Zero parts of that comment violate German law or would get the comment removed from !europe@feddit.org

    The comment doesn’t doesn’t draw a parallel to nazis nor does it call for an end to Israel, therefore it is completely fine both by German law and the moderator’s actions.

    • Suffa@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Jawohl! We must follow the law, not matter how wrong it is!

      • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        If following a law slightly restricting freedom of speech - which is fully compatible with the German constitution may I add - ensures the existence of the instance, then yes, following this law is a moral good.

        Besides, wrong laws should be followed, provided the law is not unjust in its very foundation (such as a law mandating the dealth penalty). That’s the Radbruch formula which is a core of German jurisprudence since WW2 which allows for prosecution of “legal” crimes and mandates disobedience of unjust laws.

        This current law - or rather the interpretation of it - is objectively wrong. Its foundation - the criminalization of antisemitism and Holocaust denial - however is not unjust in its very being.

        You can be assured feddit.org will never follow any “law, no matter how wrong it is” - as that would be illegal.