New European Union regulations will require products that last longer and are easier to recycle
  • balssh@lemm.eeEnglish
    37·
    2 days ago

    Please make it illegal to put basic functions behind a cloud account/internet access. You shouldn’t have to connect to wifi for your washing machine to be able to do the rinse program.

  • Perhapsjustsniffit@lemmy.ca
    9·
    2 days ago

    Canada please take note.

    Just been flying through refrigerators because we can no longer find a second hand older model. 5-6 years on a ~$2500/cad fridge that you can’t even get parts for. That’s fucked.

  • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
    9·
    2 days ago

    So, the people who lived through the Depression/WW2 wanted to buy things that would last. Their kids wanted things that were bright and shiny and disposable. The next generation wasn’t exposed to durable items and thought junk was normal.

    If I could, I’d be making ‘heritage’ items designed to last and last. “Five times the cost, but you’ll give it to your grandkids.”

    • Stovetop@lemmy.world
      7·
      2 days ago

      But it’s really not the consumer’s fault anyways, it’s the producers’. If no one is making “heritage” goods, it’s because there’s not enough money in it.

      It’s like the Sam Vimes boots theory, but applied in the other direction to look at the business models which profit from this situation. In essence, why there will eventually be nothing left but cheap boots.

      Company A sells a gadget for $2000 and it lasts 30 years. Company B sells a gadget for $1000 and it lasts 10 years. Obviously on paper, Company A is the better deal because it lasts longer, but it’s a higher upfront cost that prices some consumers out, and folks might be thinking “I don’t know if I’m even going to be around in 30 years.”

      The kicker is, if Company A is only making $100 profit per sale to price as competitive as possible, while Company B can make $500 in profit from all the cut corners, Company A will eventually get priced out of the market. Maybe they can stay afloat as a “luxury” brand where they double their cost and appeal to upper-class whales who want the “best,” but they can’t stay competitive in the standard market while making 1/5 the money. Eventually they get pushed out or bought out.

      As long as companies can make more money by cutting corners, that is the direction the market will move. The only solution around it is to legislate away a company’s ability to cut corners, either by regulated product standards or defining industry-wide minimum warranty periods.

    • tfm@europe.pubOPM
      7·
      2 days ago

      Probably, doesn’t have to be much more expensive. Just designed in a more robust way.