• DragonAce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why are these assholes so against helping people? These fuckers are nothing but greedy sociopaths.

    • bauhaus@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      conservatives view social hierarchy as a necessity which must be enforced. if you’re at the bottom, you deserve to be there, and if you’re there, you suffer because you deserve it, and because you’re at the bottom, you deserve to suffer. cruelty is the point, and without it, there can’t be the joy of their success.

      anything else, to them, is profane and must be fought/destroyed. anyone who tries to climb above their position must be punished.

      relevant videos:

      The Alt-Right Playbook: Always a Bigger Fish

      Endnote 3: The Origins of Conservatism

    • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wilholt’s law, “Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.”

      Aka, “you’re not hurting the right people”

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        “The modern conservative is engaged in one of man’s oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.”

        ― John Kenneth Galbraith

  • caveman@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    39 billions is money which could be going to Israel to support their genocide.

    Taking it from them and giving it to American education is anti semitic! /s /ADL

    • HerrBeter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The student loan interest rates are exuberant, while I support the nullification of times past, I’d also like to see the core issue being taken care of

          • HollandJim@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            That’s a contextual issue. It’s not often applied to a value but rather a feeling - that’s why I suggested “exorbitant”.

            Exuberant is also considered a positive attribute, so contextually it was confusing.

            edit: Not to be rude - I’m an American and the Dutch constantly correct me here - but instead of “obsessive” (to be obsessed with), you might consider “excessive” - much closer to “a lot of” but more “too much of”. ✌️

            • moody@lemmings.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Exorbitant meaning “eye-popping”, as in making your eyes pop out of their sockets, which is why it’s used in these contexts.

  • sYnoxjj@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Imagine there is a group that does everything in it’s power to block every positive change there could be.

    Imagine further that the same group also does everything in it’s power to change every positive thing into a negative.

    Now imagine that >48% of people vote for that group.

    And finally imagine you in a place like that.

    Honestly, unimaginable.

    • Pissnpink@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s why it drives me nuts when people get a cynical and say both parties are the same or that your vote doesn’t matter. Pay attention to how the different parties vote!

          • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Centrists are a different breed though. They’ll agree with you until the part about actually doing something to fix a problem. At that stage, suddenly “now isn’t the right time”, “we can’t afford it”, and “we should focus on incremental change”. Fuck centrists.

  • ScrollinMyDayAway@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Trillion dollar budget for the military industrial complex? Money well spent! A single dime spent to help taxpayers? Socialism!

    • PsychedSy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The majority of the federal budget goes to welfare and entitlements. I’m on the “no standing army” side of things, but it doesn’t help to propagate incorrect information.

      Edit: this is absurd. There’s no opinion here: the comment I replied to is factually wrong. You can’t dislike facts until they’re not true.

      • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        you failed to engage with their actual argument, which was that military spending is absurdly high but always univocally supported by everyone in the establishment and increased with every new budget, but that it’s an uphill fight to get anything new for people who actually need help.

        • PsychedSy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          To be fair, I engaged with that portion by pointing out I don’t actually believe in standing armies. So defense spending should be close to zero. But, yeah, everyone wants their pork and defense spending is free money to them.

          • madcaesar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You don’t believe in standing armies? I’m sorry but you’re either 5 years old or incredibly naive.