• ME5SENGER_24@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fuck this asshole. Post their faces on every billboard in Times Square. Dox them all. Anyone associated with Jan 6 should all be shot out of a cannon into the Atlantic or Pacific ocean, whichever is cheaper. Imagine what would have been going on in this country had they succeeded. That’s what the punishment should be based on.

  • Jay@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Where is this video coming from that the DOJ doesn’t already have it?

    Edit: from another article "We don’t want them to be retaliated against and to be charged by the DOJ,” the House speaker said. His office later noted that DOJ already has the raw footage.

    Exactly as u/Kbin_space_program@kbin.social said below.

    • Kbin_space_program@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I imagine that the DOJ absolutely has it.

      But telling the cult of Trump that “good ol’ Mike” is blurring their faces to “protect them from the DOJ” is an effort to endear himself to the rabid cult mob that doesn’t know any better.

      • Jay@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That was my thought as well, especially coming from the party of drama queens.

  • xenu@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Johnson will always put the interests of the Christian right before those of democracy.

  • HububBub@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I though it was all leftists, antifa, and FBI plants? Why would Johnson want to hide their faces? Unless the GOP has been lying about that. But they wouldn’t do that, would they?

        • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Its grandstanding and posturing.

          But there is actually a good argument. Someone who the DOJ have decided wasn’t worth the hassle to properly investigate might still be identified and reported by a co-worker or neighbor. Which then begins to force the DOJ’s hand (they are still cops so they might ignore it but…). I personally think everyone who crowded outside the building deserves to be locked up, but I can see an argument that only people who entered the building or who actively caused damage should be charged.

          Because yes, facial recognition and DMV databases are already a thing. But, much like with a red light ticket, a decent lawyer can work wonders to argue out “a robot claims that I commit a crime”. Whereas having a human in the loop removes that gotcha. Hell, if my cousin is any indication, you don’t even need a lawyer to argue against a red light camera or an automated speed trap and just need to care enough to show up to the courthouse for a few hours.

          Also, regardless, this is indeed (attempted) obstruction of justice to protect insurrectionists.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It is the exact textbook definition of obstruction of justice. It doesn’t get any more obstruction of justice than to literally hide identities with the express stated goal of obstructing the work of the Department of Justice.

      He’s taking a page out of Trump’s “it’s not a crime if you brag about it on tv” playbook.