Internode used to be a high quality home internet brand.

My understanding is that loyalty is never rewarded for competitive subscription services (gas, eletricity, water, internet, insurance, etc).

I wonder how long until AussieBB enshitifies?

  • DeltaTangoLima@reddrefuge.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 months ago

    Internode used to be a high quality home internet brand

    Back when Simon ran it, sure. That’s a looooong time ago though. iiNet also used to be a really good home internet provider. Like Internode, they were an ISP built by techies, for techies.

    So far, I’m still happy with Aussie BB. But, they’re listed now. That means they have shareholders to keep happy. That said, on my FTTP, they (very quickly) passed on the nbn price cut to me, which was nice.

      • legios@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Been with Internode for over 20 years, not looking forward to changing provider…

        • WaterWaiver@aussie.zoneOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          Just for internet, or something more complicated? Also it looks like they’re nuking their email service if you’re using that.

          • Dave.@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Also it looks like they’re nuking their email service if you’re using that

            Their mail service has been garbage for 6 months or more now. I have a large IMAP account with them and mail is usually delayed anywhere from one to ten hours. I typically get batch delivery of the previous day’s worth of email around midnight to 2am.

            So that’s super fun for all those password reset and account signup emails that expire in 60 minutes…

            Finally got fed up with it at the end of November. I built my own mail server with my own domain and for the next few months I’ll be slowly migrating my 20 years of signups using my internode email to my new account.

            • WaterWaiver@aussie.zoneOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 months ago

              I’ve been using a shared hosting provider for my email. I’d love to hear how your self host goes. I know there are some loud opinions on the web about how hosting your own email is hard, but also some quieter ones that say it’s working fine for them and isn’t any harder than deploying something like MailInABox.

              • legios@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                I’ve been self-hosting email for 10+years. I can confirm it’s a pain in the arse… Harder from a dynamic IP too (since you basically can’t get any reputation, or you might get an IP that’s banned for ‘x’ reasons)

                Postfix + Dovecot here

                Edit: Didn’t really give you an opinion. It’s doable if you have the time and patience. I work in IT too so I’m pretty good at troubleshooting etc. but sometimes it’s a LOT of time fiddling and debugging.

                • shirro@aussie.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  IMO the only truly difficult part of self hosting is mail delivery because you end up at the mercy of big stupid companies (eg Microsoft) that don’t give a shit. It is possible and possibly advisable to use a paid service for delivery and let someone else deal with the bastards.

                  With a bit of research and a methodical approach I think just about anybody comfortable setting up other linux network services should be fine. I am very lazy and have been doing it for 2 decades. I like being in control of my own mail store. I choose to do my own delivery and the only persistently difficult provider is Microsoft’s free email offerings which I care about about as much as they care about running a reliable mail system for their users. They seem to penalize infrequent low volume senders. I have always been signed up to their spam monitoring bullshit and have never had a negative report but they don’t seem to communicate there so you can be blocked and nobody knows how or why. They blocked most of my hosting provider once so I routed my outgoing email with correct dkim, spf etc from a server hosted elsewhere. Easy to do with Postfix.

              • Dave.@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                As mentioned below, have a look at Linuxbabe’s guide and see what you think. It was basically set up and forget (so far).

                The server I get through linode has a relatively small amount of storage. So I repartitioned the available storage of the default install and created a separate ZFS filesystem with compression enabled to hold the mailboxes. It’s compressing at about 65% of original size and even with 20 years of IMAP mail in there there’s heaps of room left.

                And holy shit it is so much faster than Internode’s server. I’ve enabled forwarding on their server so everything gets dumped to my new account, and just opening and browsing the folders/mail is so much faster now, both on my phone with the Gmail app and using thunderbird on the desktop.

  • Mountaineer@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    The end of an era indeed.

    Internode WOULD NOT move you off a grandfathered plan.

    I rode that until I had to move somewhere without FTTP :-(

    • Thisfox@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Any recommendations as an alternative? I don’t think I should surf them into the next repurchase?

      • Ilandar@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        For online gaming, Superloop and their reseller Exetel are particularly good as they take the fastest route to Asia. You’ll get significantly lower ping on Tokyo-based servers, which opens up more options if you play competitive PvP games or MMOs. Others like Aussie Broadband only take that route one way so you’ll have higher ping overall.

      • mranachi@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I use launtel, I pay a premium i think, but I don’t know because I’ve go no desire to change.

        • Ilandar@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          You can also add Exetel, which is owned by Superloop and uses their infrastructure (so has a lot of the same benefits).

  • shirro@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    There isn’t much to differentiate ISPs anymore. It used to be a huge benefit to have unmetered, low latency game servers, streaming radio mirrors, usenet feeds, IP phone services and ISP email. Internet offered a huge amount of extra value through the dialup, ISDN, ADSL1, ADSL2 era. They offered IPv6 early which was interesting to a techie early adopter and were rolling out ADSL2+ in some exchanges and wireless systems. I stuck with Internode for a long time because if your system just works there isn’t a lot of incentive to chase other providers who are more or less the same. In the NBN era they were a bit slow to deal with congestion a couple of times and I ended up moving to Superloop. I don’t know that Superloop are anything special but that is kind of the point these days. The industry is commoditised and as long as their network and billing is competently run all the NBN resellers should be fairly comparable.

    • WaterWaiver@aussie.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Latency is particularly important to me. Indirectly this means congestion, available bandwidth and buffering policies.

      I run SQM on my home router, this keeps things like web browsing buttery smooth even if someone starts torrenting. The ability for SQM to have control over the connection relies on it being the weakest/slowest/most controlling link (I configure it to a bandwidth slightly slower than my normal connection speed). If a router somewhere in the NBN/ISP networks starts buffering my packets heavily (ie my connection speed drops) then my SQM loses its control and ability to fix things.

      That’s quite a mouthful :P All I know is that with Aussie things have been OK, but that’s also probably because I’m on one of the lower tier speed plans. Higher speeds might fluctuate.

      ISPs would definitely compete if they ran on different medium; but mobile broadband is hit an miss and I don’t see any other affordable alternatives to the NBN at the moment. Starting up a community WISP sounds romantic but I’m sure it’s a lot of work and I live in the suburbs, not the urbs, so it’d probably be hard to find participants.

    • Nath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Honestly, they were on the verge of falling apart. All their gear was old.

      Had ihug not been bought when they were, their Internet service would have collapsed within a year.