• Cringe2793@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Something about Louis just strikes me as extremely untrustworthy. I’m not sure what it is, but it’s definitely there.

    • alldreadme@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      He might come off as edgy but honestly he’s one of the few people I trust online. Dude did amaizing stuff with right to repair stuff too.

    • vivadanang@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      everything I’ve ever seen about the guy is legit. he works for consumer rights, if you want untrustworthy look at Apple.

  • LeylaLove [she/her, love/loves]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Y’all are ignoring what this actually is - an app for EVERY video platform. Also, restrictive license is fine as long as the source code is available. Rossman explains this is to keep people from just forking and making scam versions of the app like NewPipe sees.

    • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      A lot of the people complaining about the license don’t get this. Also doubly surprised at those saying they won’t use it because the license doesn’t allow them to redistribute the app with malware, or charge money for it 🤦‍♂️

      I’m also completely baffled at the amount of people here who have never heard of Louis Rossmann… literally the dude behind Right to Repair

  • FiveMacs@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah I’d rather not give all my details for multiple sites to one site…regardless of who’s doing it.

    • PlzGivHugs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Its effectively unlimited trialware, like WinRar. Its provided free and has no payment verification, but if you use it regularly, you’re expected to pay the approximately $10 price tag.

    • PrivateNoob@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Louis explains the license in the video. You can fork it and modify it, but if you fill it up with ads, spyware, malware etc., they fill fuck you.

      • smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That’s their goal. They have good intentions. But it also means no commercial use.

        You can’t do “Hey, can you add this feature to this app, I’ll pay you” or “Here is much improved version you can buy from me” or “We give you paid support and help for this software for your company”. Eventually all improvements bounce back to original creators anyway, see: vital paid Wordpress theme ecosystem, most of them being GPL licenced.

        With project getting bigger such restriction can be almost as bad as with propietary app. Like, imagine Linux kernel but only with Linus Torvalds having right to sell computers with it or offer any services making money.

      • stifle867@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You can not modify the source code.

        you are not entitled to use or do anything with the code for any commercial or other purpose, other than review, compilation and non-commercial distribution in accordance with the terms of this license.

        “review” means to access, analyse, test and otherwise review the code as a reference, for the sole purpose of analysing it for defects.

        • zolax@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          doesn’t it allow compilation and non-commercial distribution? I don’t agree with the license (not free or open source), but I’m genuinely curious on what specifically doesn’t allow source code modification.

          • stifle867@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It does allow compilation and non-commercial distribution, as per the terms my comment above. If you’re curious as to what disallows source code modifications, that is also contained in the terms included in my comment above.